Thursday, December 19, 2013

SURPRISE! (Or How I Learned to Love the "Gasp")


In a world (see what I did there?) of spoilers and leaks and previews and all else, it's rare these days that anything slips past those who might be looking for it. So when something is a surprise, it's a rare treat.

I remember seeing “The Avengers” in the movie theatre over July 4th weekend in 2012. The movie theatre was packed; full of Marvel comics fans and those who had been dragged with them. And I remember sitting through the movie, laughing at the jokes and cheering for the home team. But then, after the credits had rolled, there was a tag. And the audience got a glimpse of a purple-y creature berating someone for not doing their job (at least that's my memory of it). A hush fell over the audience. And then a cheer erupted.

At the time, I didn't know who that creature was; I had to have it explained to me by an enthusiastic fan with whom we ended up sharing an elevator ride to the parking garage. And even after it was explained, it didn't really mean much to me, not really being a Marvel comics superfan. But I think that the real magic of that moment was that, prior to that screening, no one in the audience knew anything about the tag.

I think that many of them suspected that there would be a tag; it has become a bit of a cinematic staple. But they didn't know the content. And in this world of midnight screenings and early previews, no one had leaked it yet. And because no one had leaked it, everyone in that audience got to experience the power of The Surprise.

Now, I will allow that spoilers have their place. I will also contend that not everything that is revealed about what happens in a movie is a spoiler. The phrase “Spoiler alert: the good guy wins” grates me like no other. Of course, the good guy wins! That is not a spoiler.

A spoiler is the oft-used “Darth Vader is Luke's father” because it revealed something unexpected in an action/hero movie. (These days it has become such a staple that the villian and the hero will have some sort of familial connection that it would be totally different if the screenwriters just wrote, “Yeah, they're not related AT ALL.”) But the familial connection in Star Wars was what is still (thank heaven) colloquially known as a twist. And for good reason.

A twist is something that causes you to “twist” the way that you've been thinking about and interacting with these characters. Going back to “The Avengers”: If for some reason you found out that Thor was the adopted son and Loki, Odin's actual child, that might twist/skew the way that you look at their world and interactions.

And because it's up to any good fan to know the full plot of every movie, TV show or televised event, we have spoilers. Which ruin twists. And that makes me mad. (Maybe even Hulk-mad.)

My issues with this practice came into focus for me after two events this past month. The first was that I was reading the third book in Sarah MacLean's Rule of Scoundrels series “No Good Duke Goes Unpunished” (which I talk a little bit about here) and there is a twist. An ingenious twist, I dare say. But what was so awesome about it was that I didn't expect it. I didn't expect the “tag” (so to speak), other than the standard epilogue that is part of any romance novel these days. But I also didn't expect the content. So I got to be genuinely surprised. And shocked. And yes, I may have even gasped.

Which was great! It was a great feeling to be surprised. I think, with regards to our entertainment media, we should all endeavor to be surprised more often.

The second thing that happened (and is still happening) is that the promotion engine for “I Frankenstein” is churning up. As a longtime fan of both the show “Chuck” and Yvonne Strahovski, I've known about this movie for awhile. But because it's a science-fiction movie and an action movie, the promotion engine is going down a path that I HATE! An exclusive scene here. An extended trailer there. And then by the time you get into the theatre, you've seen the whole movie!

And I know that there have been studies where studios have shown that spoilers don't actually keep people from going to the movie or seeing the show. I know that the pilot episode for “New Girl” was put on iTunes well before it ever aired on television and that the preview of the pilot did nothing to diminish the ratings for the show. I know all of that.

But I'm talking about me. When I go to the movies, I want to be entertained. I do not want to be marking time between revealed scenes. And if you can surprise me, so much the better.

I wait with baited breath. 

- Sis

Sunday, December 15, 2013

PODCAST: A Hot Steaming Cup of...Tolstoy, Bronte and Scoundrels (Plus a glimpse behind the scenes)

We're back!  Finally!  We know.  Our apologies.

Listen in as we catch up on some of the things that we left hanging.

PODCAST: A Hot Steaming Cup of...Tolstoy, Bronte and Scoundrels

Also, just for your amusement, we've included a behind-the-scenes segment on the new intro.

Behind-The-Scenes on the New Intro

Enjoy!

Wednesday, March 20, 2013

Why I Do NOT want a Chuck Movie....Right Now

With the success of the Veronica Mars Kickstarter movie, there has been a lot of discussion about what other shows should have a fan-funded movie.  Usually these are fan favorites, cancelled too soon. "Chuck" has been thrown around a lot, as well as "Firefly" (which actually had a movie).  And even Zachary Levi, Chuck himself, waded into the mix.

I'm going to try to keep my disclaimers to a minimum, but just know the following:
  1. I loved LOVED "Chuck".  (Okay, so not initially, but I grew to love it.  See "Chuck" Drinking Game and MFN Take on "Chuck" (podcast)).
  2. I miss the show terribly and still watch old episodes.
But I don't want a "Chuck" movie.  At least not right now.

It's too soon.  The show only ended A YEAR AGO!  Come on, people.  We can wait a little bit longer, can't we?

I don't want to be disappointed or have negative feelings about any of the actors that aren't going to be able to be a part of the movie.  Hollywood is many things, but one of the things that it is most, is a constant producer of entertainment.  Projects are being cast every day and I wouldn't want one of the cast to miss out on the movie just because they were working on something else that would propel their careers forward, instead of backwards into nostalgia.

And I would be upset, too; I know that I would.  What "Chuck" movie could possibly be any good if it didn't have Jeff and Lester or Morgan or even Sarah?  But, what if those actors were working on something else when all of the pieces came together for the movie.  Remember how disappointed you (I'm talking to the fanbase now) were when Sarah Lancaster or Ryan McPartlin couldn't be at the "Chuck" panel at NerdHQ2012 (or that Yvonne Strahovski had to leave the before the second one started because she was working on "Dexter").  That's what I'm talking about.  We don't want that for the movie, right?

Josh Schwartz and Chris Fedak.  A "Chuck" movie would not be written by the fans.  It would be written by the same two yahoos (I mean that lovingly, honestly.) that entertained, teased, enticed and infuriated us for 5 seasons.  By the way, for all of you (the fanbase) who think this might be a better send-off than the "Chuck" finale, remember Josh and Chris wrote the "Chuck" finale.  (Just think about that.)

It's not going to turn out the way we think it will.  I call this "The X-Files phenomenom" (but it can also be extended to "Firefly/Serenity").  X-Files has now had 2 movies made for the big screen.  And neither of them has satisfied the fans in any way, shape or form.  Let's not sour our love for this show by asking for something we're not going to like. 


Lazy interviewers.  I want interviewers to ask the actors different things than how they felt about the ending of "Chuck" or the fanbase of "Chuck" or whatever iteration of "Chuck" question is the laziest one they can come up with.  Regardless of whatever project they have done since the end of the show, any recent interview with Zachary Levi, Yvonne Strahovski or Adam Baldwin has had a "Chuck" question.  And usually it's a dumb question (I blame the interviewer).

I realize that there is something to be said for keeping a memory alive and a shout-out to a very passionate fanbase, but I feel that we are allowing the interviewers to get lazy.  And I want to hear something new!  Either ask a different question, which let's be honest, the cast might not remember any more information than what they've already shared, or ask about something else. Like maybe their current project? Just a thought.

They don't need it. If I really believed that any of the actors from "Chuck" needed this movie to be made, I would be all about it, wholeheartedly.  But I don't.  They are all just fine, exploring and growing their careers and generally doing quite well for themselves.  We can wait.

The cast are not their characters.  Okay.  How to put this gently?  Zac, Yvonne, Adam, Josh, Sarah, Ryan and all of the cast of "Chuck" are great actors.  So much so that it is too easy (even for this longtime pop culture consumer) to forget where the actor ends and the character starts.  But, and this should be understood, at the end of the day, they are actors.  They are not their characters.  An on-screen reunion of Chuck and Sarah has nothing whatsoever to do with the off-screen relations of Zac and Yvonne.  Even my shipper heart (and it is strong and true on this pairing) can see this.   

Here is what I would like, at some point in the future (just so that this post isn't entirely negative)

I would love LOVE LOVE to see a Paley Festival type panel reunion.  Give it about 4 years.
Get all of the cast together to really talk about the show and what it meant to them and what they've never shared, memories that time has allowed to resurface, whatever.  Make it as geeky and unstructured as possible so that it is just a (taped) conversation among friends. 

I would also love (and will gladly pay whatever amount is requested) anniversary DVD sets (or whatever media we will be using in about 4 or so years).  I already have all of the "Chuck" seasons on DVD, but I will buy them all again if they have extra bonuses.  Like what extra bonuses, the studios and sponsors ask.

Here's what I would want on the Anniversary DVD sets:
  • Episode commentary from some of the actors and writers we haven't heard from.  (I'm looking at you, Yvonne and Adam.)  
  • Extended Blooper Reels
  • Cut or Deleted Scenes
Now, after saying all of this, if a "Chuck" movie does get made, I will be one of the first in line to buy tickets and will see it on opening weekend.  (I am still a fan, after all.  I'm not going to boycott the movie.  Let's not get crazy here, folks.)  But I think we all (again, talking to the fanbase) need to take a step back and really think about what we're asking for when we ask for a "Chuck" movie.  And what we actually really want.

- Sis

Wednesday, February 27, 2013

PODCAST: A Hot Steaming Cup of...Julia Stiles, King of the Nerds, Keri Russell and Bunheads

My Favorite Neighbors enthusiastically welcome back to television both Julia Stiles (in the Hallmark movie, "The Makeover") and Keri Russell (in the FX series, "The Americans).  We are glad to have both of them back on our televisions again.  Bring on the 90s nostalgia!

We also watched King of the Nerds, mainly because Kevin Smith and Jay Mewes were in one episode.  :)  Hey, at least we're honest.

And finally, Sis expresses her deep and unabiding love for ABC Family's Bunheads.

A Hot Steaming Cup of...Julia Stiles, King of the Nerds, Keri Russell and Bunheads

Listen in! 

Wednesday, February 20, 2013

PODCAST: A Hot Steaming Cup of...Lord of the Rings and War and Peace

For our New Year's Eve marathon, we, being good Pop Culture disciples watched Lord of the Rings Trilogy.  And immediately regretted it.  Like even before the first movie was over.

This year, Squirt has agreed to read "War and Peace" with her friends.  Now, she just needs to remember who wrote it (Hint: It is not Dostoevsky). 

It's gonna be a photo finish as to which task takes longer! :)

Listen in!

A Hot Steaming Cup of...Lord of the Rings and War and Peace

Wednesday, February 13, 2013

PODCAST: A Hot Steaming Cup of...Oscar Nominations

We're back!  And just in time for Oscar season.  Yay!*

A Hot Steaming Cup of...Oscar Nominations

We break down how we've broken down over Lincoln and Les Miserables.  And then we veer off into a discussion about The Sound of Music. 
So just like old times. :)  Enjoy!

*(There might have been some sarcasm in that 'Yay!' :) )